There are some two million more tourists per annum than there were in 2017. | Ruiz Collado
In this column last week, you may have detected a certain weariness on my behalf with the government’s sustainability pact. So many months in the uniting and the falling apart, February 27 will come as a massive relief. That is S-Day, Sustainability Day, when the pact is meant to reveal all and President Prohens is due to present her proposals for addressing tourist overcrowding. Or at least I think this is the plan, easy as it has been to lose track because of the incessant statements as a long-drawn-out prelude to the wisdoms of the pact’s experts being issued as though they were the Ten Commandments; twelve in fact, as there are twelve pact working parties.
1 comment
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
Not that "tourism saturation" has much to do with holiday lets - there are many orders of magnitude more hotel rooms. The proclaimed issue with holiday lets is that they increase rents beyond the reach of the average worker, who need affordable living spaces - and apartments are the defacto picks for those needing "affordable" accommodation. So, if you want to tackle that problem head-on, start by making apartments illegal to rent short term. And enforce it. Otherwise, those big fincas and villas that are attracting big spending tourists have no effect on "affordable" rents. The average Joe wouldn't go there anyway. It's important to distinguish between the two. And again, it's important to distinguish between "tourist saturation" and "affordable housing". They are two very different things that are all but totally unrelated. Attacking one to solve the other will have no useful effect.