Alorda believes that the process was irregular and that the company - Schlumberger - has two such processes for the same project, one from 2011 and the other from 2014, which suggest irregularity. In the event that the process is archived, the process, Alorda notes, would have to be started again and would have to be open to public consultation through which challenges could be made: something very important, given the opposition to oil prospecting in the Balearics.
The project was started four years by the company Seabird Exploration and was then replaced by Schlumberger, who followed the same process from 2011 but also opened another in 2014 for the same purpose. The latter of these included an acoustic impact report. According to administrative procedure, there cannot be two processes with the same objective.
Alorda is confident that the national ministry’s decision will be favourable to the Balearics. Recently the Scottish-based company Cairn Energy announced that is was going to halt its prospecting operations in Balearic waters, despite having been granted permission by the previous socialist government, as pressure against prospecting in Spain and from international organisations mounted. But now, Alorda wants a total ban.
2 comments
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
If you want the lights to stay on then you must extract the oil and gas from under the sea. It can be done with minimal environmental and visual impact. It's not going to happen on the beach, nor in sight of it.
I still fail to understand why the Balearic residents are objecting to oil prospecting. The revenue alone, along with increased jobs and prosperity, are NOT WANTED !!!. In today's modern prospecting technology, there is no effect on the sea, fish and the areas where oil is extracted. Perhaps it is a lack of knowledge that is causing a misguided protest.