Salinas has now admitted that during his visit to the Vatican to discuss economic matters related to the diocese there was also a discussion of the complaint that had reached the Vatican via the Apostolic Nunciature in Madrid. Sources within the diocese are stressing that this was not why he went to the Vatican.
He explained that, although other bishops had recommended his keeping his “silence”, the magnitude of the controversy had obliged him to speak publicly and also to defend himself to the governing bodies at the diocese. He insisted that an exchange of rings with the woman at the centre of the matter, now identified as Sonia Valenzuela, was to do with membership in a prayer group that they had formed and that they did not signify anything more. These rings do not, as has been alleged, have names, just the inscription “caminante” (which can refer to a pilgrim).
Salinas was talking to members of the media at the New Seminary in Palma, where he had met with the ecclesiastical bodies which form part of the principal governance of the diocese. He stressed that he had not breached any of his obligations or vows.
Therefore, he was not planning on resigning, although he would accept any decision made by his superiors. Both the Vatican and the Nunciature have let Salinas know that they have assumed their responsibilities in checking the veracity of claims, although the analysis has not yet been concluded.
No comments
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
Currently there are no comments.