The opposition PSOE, who introduced the original decree in January 2020, accused tourism minister Jaume Bauzá of promoting drunken tourism. Llorenç Pou of PSOE said: "The only thing left is to approve subsidies for businesses that sell alcohol so they can stay open at night." Pou insisted that no step back should be taken: "Do not change the decree."
The amended decree was supposed to have been approved by the cabinet last Friday. In the end it wasn't even discussed. This followed howls of protest from the opposition but more significantly for the government from business associations. Hotels, restaurants, nightlife, shops, the Confederation of Balearic Business Associations all attacked a lack of consultation and certain provisions of the decree.
One of these concerned an apparent reduction in fines, the maximum of which, dependent on the particular offence, is currently 600,000 euros. It was widely reported that there would be a reduction of 33%. Bauzá flatly denied this in parliament: "Sanctions will not be lowered."
While a change to regulation of party boats has created murmurs of discontent, businesses' anger has mainly been reserved for the regulation of the sale of alcohol. The ban on the sale between 9.30pm and 8am in those parts of resorts in Mallorca and Ibiza to which the decree applies will continue, but the shops concerned will not have to close at 9.30. The criticism is that this will encourage clandestine liquor stores and fuel street drinking, a cause of anti-social behaviour in the resorts.
Ahead of Tuesday's parliamentary session, Bauzá and tourism ministry officials held a meeting with business associations' representatives. At that meeting, it was said that the tourism and health ministries will be studying the prohibition of alcohol consumption in public places along lines adopted in cities such as Barcelona. It should be noted that the tourism of excesses decree and municipal bylaws already do ban drinking on the streets when it comes to gatherings - the so-called 'botellón'.
Otherwise on Tuesday, parliament was informed that the revised decree will have an expiry date - it is currently indefinite - and that town halls will be able to decide on the zoning for applying the decree's provisions.
At present, the decree applies to parts of Magalluf, Playa de Palma, Arenal (Llucmajor) and Sant Antoni in Ibiza. Thus far, there has been no indication that the decree might be extended to other resort areas.
As to when the revised decree might now be approved, Bauzá, stung by last week's reaction, says that the final wording of the decree will not be approved without it having been analysed by business associations. The next meeting could be next week.
4 comments
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
Christopher GrubbFor a start, provide sufficient number of police on the streets of Magaluf, Arenal etc. That would solve half the problem. Numbers are chronically low as things stand. Banning alcohol sales after 9.30pm (with comically high fines for infringing supermarkets) is a useless political gesture, so that the politicians look like they're doing something.
Jules O...and what do you propose then? Remove the decree entirely? Zero restrictions? Easy to criticise existing legislation, which in my view doesn't go far enough, needs to be far stricter imo - but let's hear your suggestions.
Ya think, nothing will change will cash is generated from drunks on holiday.
Here's the (hypothetical) scenario. I go on a youth holiday to Magaluf. I want to buy cheap alcohol from a supermarket to avoid having to pay higher bar and club prices. On my first night, I discover that shops can't sell alcohol after 9.30pm. I'm annoyed. The following day, I walk from my hotel to Aldi Magaluf and stock up on cheap booze. Job done. The post-9.30pm ban on shop-based alcohol sales is irrelevant to me for the rest of my holiday. Back to the non-hypothetical. Go and visit Aldi Magaluf any time between now and late September. You will see exactly the above scenario played out throughout each day of the summer. In other words, this law is nonsense, utterly meaningless, and only serves to damage small shopkeepers.