by RAY FLEMING
NO one who saw the venom aimed at Edward Liddy by some members of the US Congressional Finance Committee last week will be surprised that the House of Representatives subsequently passed retrospective legislation to tax at 90 per cent bonuses paid to executives of companies getting bail-out money from the US government. Mr Liddy was brought in last September to rescue the insurer AIG from the abysmal mess it had got itself into and he is working for precisely one dollar a year. He should be treated with respect, not with abuse. Nonetheless, members of Congress probably feel that they are reflecting the views of their angry constituents when they attack someone like Mr Liddy -- the recipients of bonuses of up to four million dollars seldom appear in public.
Both in Britain and the United States the main defence of such bonuses is that they enable banks and other financial institutions to retain the expert services of the people they need to unravel the complex financial deals which have gone so seriously wrong, without causing still further damage. The fact that a typical expert of this kind may well be the very same person who created the problem in the first place does not seem to bother the employers. It is a strange world in which you can benefit so spectacularly from your failure.
WAR ON WALL STREET
26/03/2013 00:00
Also in Holiday
- Britons cash in on the outgoing Golden Visa in Spain to beat the 90 day rule
- After a holiday in Mallorca Richard Gere moves to Spain
- Laura Hamilton: “I’ve always loved Mallorca, I just wished I’d bought here earlier...”
- Russian-owned Black Pearl in Mallorca
- Noel Gallagher sold his Ibiza home because of his neighbour - James Blunt
No comments
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
Currently there are no comments.