The rising sea level means poor old Venice is predicted to sink by 2100. | EFE
Beautiful but hot and bothered Venice, the floating city, has thrown in the towel. It is sinking and fast. I’m not referring to its dubious state, perched on a muddy lagoon that is gradually subsiding. That and the rising sea level means poor old Venice is predicted to sink by 2100. All that aside, it’s sinking in another way and I’m referring to overtourism. Thousands of day trippers pour into the fragile and tiny city of canals, while massive, grotesque cruise ships scar its horizon. Locals have become more vociferous in their protestations, not unlike those in the Canary islands, and now in desperation, the mayor has introduced a €5 fee to enter the city unless staying overnight.
2 comments
To be able to write a comment, you have to be registered and logged in
Just a note, but I’d agree with Morgan. Airbnb numbers are already controlled by the ETV system. Mallorcan rental properties all need an ETV number and permit to be legally rented. And the number has to be recorded on the rental site. So, easy for inspectors to catch illegally rented properties. A few years ago the system was tightened up. Now an ETV permit costs a bomb and is very difficult to get. Totally unlike the numbers of rental rooms in hotels - which appear to be growing with no control. Who’s the villain here I wonder?
Anna, surely you're aware that Airbnbs have little if anything to do with "tourist overcrowding". The number of hotel rooms here (and in any popular tourist destination) absolutely dwarfs the number of private tourists lets. But naturally, the hoteliers view private tourist lets as a "threat", and therefore champion any anti-tourist-let narratives in the media. Yet tourist lets provide a desirable alternative (read: more choice) to the 20 sqM hotel room, offering much more for the money, which explains why they're becoming more and more popular. The problem is that those in control (politicians) are something like Taylor Swift doing brain surgery. They haven't a clue, but are tasked with the job. Don't know or understand the demographic difference, so fancy using blunt instruments to "solve" the "problem", which they don't actually understand. And it's not a left-right thing. They're both clueless about the nuance, and frankly, not all that different from each other. So, please don't start believing your own rhetoric.